update_an_exclusion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint false, idempotentHint true, destructiveHint false. Description repeats 'Idempotent' and adds 'Modifies an existing record in place', but lacks details on side effects, auth needs, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise, two sentences plus a header. Front-loaded with 'WRITE' indicator. However, the emoji and caps are slightly distracting but not harmful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description doesn't indicate what the response includes (e.g., updated object vs status). For an update tool, this is a notable gap. Annotations fill some safety context but not return format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers both parameters with full descriptions. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what's in the schema, so baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it updates an exclusion, with verb 'update' and resource 'exclusion'. Distinguishes from sibling read operations like 'exclusions_retrieve_a_list'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Only states idempotence but not when to prefer this over create or delete operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.