delete_a_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint=true, and the description reinforces this with 'DESTRUCTIVE' and 'deletes data,' but does not add new behavioral traits beyond the annotations. The confirmation instruction is a useful addition, but overall transparency is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using a header with icon and HTTP method, followed by clear statements. Each sentence serves a purpose, though the header may partially repeat the title. No unnecessary wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose and a key usage warning. It does not specify return values or side effects beyond deletion, but this is typical for a delete operation and overall completeness is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter 'id' with a clear schema description. The description does not add additional semantic meaning beyond the schema, so with 100% coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a list' and 'Deletes a record,' making the purpose obvious. It uses a strong verb-resource combination and distinguishes from siblings by specificity, though it does not explicitly differentiate from similar delete tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only usage guidance is 'Confirm with the user before calling,' which suggests a prerequisite but lacks context on when to use this tool over alternatives, such as update or retrieve tools for lists. No explicit when-not-to-use or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.