Skip to main content
Glama
ohneben

ActiveCampaign MCP

delete_an_account

DestructiveIdempotent

Delete an account by providing its ID. User confirmation is required before executing this destructive operation.

Instructions

🔴 DESTRUCTIVE · deletes data · Accounts · DELETE /accounts/{id}

Delete an account

Deletes a record. Confirm with the user before calling.

Delete an existing account

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesAccount's id
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly calls out 'DESTRUCTIVE' and 'deletes data', consistent with annotations (destructiveHint=true). It adds the safety instruction to confirm with the user. However, it does not disclose irreversibility, cascading effects, or whether a soft delete occurs. Annotations already cover the destructive nature, so the description provides marginal added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive: 'Delete an account' appears twice, and 'Deletes a record.' and 'Delete an existing account' are similar. It could be tightened to one sentence. However, it is still relatively short.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one required parameter and no output schema, the description covers the destructive nature and safety confirmation. However, it lacks details on response behavior (e.g., returns success message or just 200) and whether the account is physically removed or archived. The annotations partially compensate, but completeness is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'id' parameter described as 'Account's id'. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, which is acceptable given high coverage. No extra context like format constraints or examples is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete an account' with the verb 'delete' and resource 'account'. It differentiates from sibling delete tools (e.g., delete_a_deal) by specifying 'Accounts' in the header. However, it could be more explicit about what an 'account' represents in this context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a direct instruction: 'Confirm with the user before calling.', which is a clear usage guideline. However, it lacks details on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., bulk_delete_accounts) and does not mention prerequisites like ownership or permissions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ohneben/ActiveCampaign-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server