retrieve_a_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reaffirms read-only behavior, consistent with annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint). However, it adds minimal beyond annotations, lacking details on response format or potential limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with three short lines, front-loading the read-only indicator and method. No wasteful sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter read-only tool without output schema, the description adequately covers functionality and safety. Slight gap in explaining what the response contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single 'id' parameter with a clear description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Retrieve a group' with the specific verb and resource, includes HTTP method 'GET', and explicitly says it fetches data without changes. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_a_new_group or delete_a_group_1.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when needing to retrieve a group by ID and emphasizes it is read-only, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives like list_all_groups.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.