create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-idempotent and non-readonly; description adds 'Not idempotent — calling twice may create duplicates' which matches the annotation. No additional behavioral traits are disclosed (e.g., auth needs, side effects on related resources).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive, saying 'Create a task' multiple times. It could be streamlined to a single sentence without losing meaning. The header line adds useful context but is not technically part of the description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite complex nested parameters and no output schema, the description does not provide examples, clarify the relational nature (deal tasks), or explain how required fields like 'relid' and 'duedate' should be used. The tool is incomplete for an agent to use effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all properties having descriptions. The description does not add any extra parameter information beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a task and includes the resource 'Deal Tasks' and endpoint. However, it does not differentiate from many sibling 'create_*' tools, and the repetition ('Create a task') adds no new information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_a_deal_new or others. The description does not specify context, prerequisites, or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.