disconnect_ur

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states the basic action (disconnect) without mentioning side effects, permission requirements, or state changes (e.g., does it invalidate sessions?). This is insufficient for safe usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short lines, front-loading the action and parameter meaning. No unnecessary words, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential what and what-for. However, it lacks context about preconditions (e.g., must be connected) and postconditions (e.g., disconnection success). Slightly incomplete but adequate for basic understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has no description for the 'ip' parameter (0% coverage). The description's line 'IP：机器人地址' adds minimal context that the IP represents the robot's address, but does not specify format or constraints. It adds some value beyond the schema but is not comprehensive.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it disconnects from a UR robot based on the provided IP, using specific verb '断开' (disconnect) and resource 'UR机器人' (UR robot). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'connect_ur'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites like being connected first. The sibling 'connect_ur' suggests a pairing, but there's no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.