Get a specific Deployer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/non-destructive, so safety is covered. The description adds the required permission (manage_endpoints), which is genuinely useful context, but says nothing about return shape or what a deployer represents. Since an output schema exists, that omission is tolerable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action. The second sentence largely restates the first ('Obtains the current information about the specified...'), a minor redundancy, but the permission note is tacked on efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-resource read with a full parameter schema and an output schema, the description covers purpose and authorization adequately. The one real gap is that it never explains what a Deployer is or how it differs from related deployer tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters (org_id, verbose, deployer_id, response_format) are documented in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning, e.g. it never mentions the required deployer_id or the response_format default, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get) and resource (a specific Deployer / Action1 Deployer service), which separates it from the sibling list tool action1_list_endpoint_deployers by the word 'specific'. It doesn't name the sibling explicitly, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by 'specific Deployer' and the stated permission 'manage_endpoints'. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or named alternative such as action1_list_endpoint_deployers or action1_delete_deployer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.