Getting a specific Deployer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds the required permission ('Perm: manage_endpoints'), which is valuable. No contradiction with annotations. Additional details about response format or error behavior are absent but not critical given the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two sentences, 21 words) and front-loaded with the action. Every sentence serves a purpose: stating the action and providing the permission requirement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with a complete output schema and rich annotations, the description covers the essential purpose and permission. It lacks mention of error handling or availability, but the core function is well communicated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and parameter descriptions are already present. The description does not add any new meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Getting a specific Deployer') and the resource ('Action1 Deployer service'). The verb 'get' and the target 'deployer' are specific, and the distinction from sibling list tools is clear due to the focus on a single deployer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a deployer ID, but it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool instead of alternatives like action1_list_endpoint_deployers or when not to use it. No direct guidance on prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.