action1-mcp-server

Delete an endpoint

action1_delete_endpoint

DestructiveIdempotent

Deletes a specified endpoint and attempts to uninstall its agent; supports dry-run preview and requires YES confirmation before execution.

Instructions

Delete an endpoint. Removes a specified endpoint and attempts to uninstall its agent. Perm: manage_endpoints.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`org_id`	No	Org UUID.
`confirm`	No	Required to execute. Exact string "YES".
`dry_run`	No	Default true (preview). Set false to execute.
`endpoint_id`	Yes	Provide an endpoint ID.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	No
`tool`	No
`type`	No
`status`	No
`dry_run`	No
`would_send`	No
`user_message`	No
`developer_message`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed11 schema fields changedv0.6.0Oct 26, 2026
- changedInput schema / $schema
```
Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
```
- changedOutput schema / $schema
```
Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
```
- changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Previous value: -trueNew value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / developer_message
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / dry_run
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / id
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / status
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / tool
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / type
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / user_message
```
Added value: +{}
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / would_send
```
Added value: +{}
```
First observedv0.5.0Jun 27, 2026

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuine value by disclosing the agent-uninstall side effect and the required 'manage_endpoints' permission. However, it omits that dry_run defaults to true and that confirm="YES" is required — critical execution behavior for a destructive action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action, with no filler. The permission clause earns its place; only minor loss for not surfacing the dry_run/confirm workflow in the same compact form.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with an output schema present, the return values need not be explained, but the description should flag the preview-by-default and confirmation-string workflow an agent must follow before deleting. That gap leaves it adequate but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all four parameters are documented in the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond what is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Delete an endpoint') and adds scope by clarifying that it also attempts to uninstall the endpoint's agent. It's clearly distinguishable from siblings like action1_delete_group, action1_delete_deployer, or action1_update_endpoint, though it doesn't explicitly name them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no mention of the required confirm="YES" gate or the dry_run default of true, which are the key decision points for invoking this destructive tool. The agent is left to discover the two-step preview/execute workflow from the schema alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server