Delete custom Software Repository package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructive and idempotent behavior. The description adds context about deleting 'custom' packages and the permission requirement, but does not elaborate on side effects or reversibility. Beyond annotations, it adds useful but limited information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the action and resource type, then adds a permission note.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete tool with an output schema and fully described parameters, the description covers essential context (permission, resource type). However, it omits mention of the dry_run and confirm safety mechanisms, which are important for agent understanding. The schema fills these gaps, but the description could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameters described. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond noting deletion 'by its ID' and the permission requirement. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete custom Software Repository package' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_package, update_package, clone_package.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the required permission ('Perm: manage_software_repository') but provides no guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives, nor any exclusions. Usage is implied but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.