Starting a new remote session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, so the description adds minimal transparency. It mentions the required permission 'remote_connect', but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether existing sessions are terminated), endpoint reachability requirements, or any irreversible actions beyond what the annotations imply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences plus permission note) but contains redundancy: 'Starting a new remote session' and 'Sends a request to the endpoint to start a new remote session' say essentially the same thing. It could be more compact or front-loaded with critical details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (nested body object, required confirm parameter, dry_run, output schema exists but not described), the description lacks essential context. It does not explain the preview-then-execute flow implied by dry_run, nor the meaning of the output. With many sibling tools, no differentiation is provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameters described, so the baseline is 3. The tool description does not add any extra meaning or context to parameters like 'body', 'confirm', or 'dry_run'. It repeats no parameter information, but also provides no additional semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'starting' and resource 'remote session', matching the tool name and title. However, it does not distinguish this 'create' operation from the sibling 'action1_update_remote_session' or other remote session tools, but the purpose is still unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'action1_update_remote_session' or 'action1_get_remote_session'. No prerequisites, preconditions, or when-not-to-use scenarios are mentioned. The agent must infer usage solely from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.