Create a automation schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the description's mention of permission adds context. However, it does not disclose potential side effects (e.g., if the schedule overwrites an existing one) or what happens upon execution with dry_run=false.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of three sentences, the first two of which largely repeat the title. While it is not verbose, it could be more concise by combining them. The placement of permission at the end is acceptable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, nested body, output schema, destructive annotation), the description lacks critical context such as the difference between schedule and instance, the purpose of dry_run and confirm, and whether scheduling is immediate or deferred. It feels incomplete for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as clarifying the structure of the body or the role of confirm/dry_run. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a automation schedule' and 'Schedules a new automation,' indicating the primary action. It also mentions execution against endpoints, which differentiates it from similar create tools like action1_create_automation_instance. However, it could more explicitly distinguish between a schedule and an instance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for scheduling automations on endpoints and mentions the required permission 'manage_automations.' However, it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives like action1_create_automation_instance, nor does it specify when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.