Skip to main content
Glama
mguttmann
by mguttmann

Related Servers

Alternatives to action1-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude and other LLM applications to execute PowerShell commands, scripts, and perform system operations on Windows systems.
      10
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Atera RMM API. Implements a decision tree architecture for efficient tool discovery, enabling Claude to manage devices, alerts, tickets, and customers in Atera.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Action1, a cloud-native RMM platform, enabling remote monitoring, patch management, and endpoint management through Action1's API.
      6
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that connects Claude Code to your work environment through auditable tools for file operations, API calls, and command execution, with safety gates and configuration.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 166 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    With 166 tools, there is significant overlap and multiple ways to perform similar actions (e.g., endpoints have get_endpoint, list_endpoints, search_endpoints, endpoints_summary). While descriptions often help, the large number makes it hard for an agent to reliably distinguish between closely related tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow the 'action1_verb_noun' pattern with occasional qualifiers. Minor deviations exist (e.g., 'action1_cve_remediation_plan' vs. 'action1_create_cve_remediation'), but overall consistency is high for such a large set.

    Tool Count1/5

    166 tools is far beyond the recommended range (3-15) and indicates near-complete API exposure rather than a curated, coherent tool set. This overwhelming number undermines usability for both agents and humans.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers CRUD for endpoints, groups, automations, scripts, packages, reports, vulnerabilities, users, roles, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete_automation_instance, only stop), but overall the surface is very comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing