Skip to main content
Glama
mguttmann
by mguttmann

Deploy a software package

action1_deploy_package
Destructive

Deploy software to endpoints or endpoint groups using a deployment template. Customize parameters, preview with dry run, then confirm with 'YES' to execute.

Instructions

Deploy software via the deploy_package template. Use action1_get_action_template for the params schema.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoFriendly action name.
org_idNoOrg UUID.
paramsYesTemplate params for deploy_package.
confirmNoRequired to execute. Exact string "YES".
dry_runNoDefault true (preview). Set false to execute.
endpoint_idYesEndpoint UUID, or Group ID when target_type='EndpointGroup'.
target_typeNoEndpoint (default) or EndpointGroup for fan-out.
response_formatNoOutput format. Default markdown.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true. Description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., confirmation required, dry-run capability, effect on endpoints). Schema covers these, but description does not flag them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no redundancy. First sentence states purpose, second provides useful cross-reference.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists so return value not needed. However, description misses deployment context (e.g., targets, side effects, preconditions). Adequate but not comprehensive for a destructive action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description hints at external params schema, adding marginal value. No contradiction or omission.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'deploy' and resource 'software package', and references the template. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like action1_deploy_update or action1_run_script.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to use action1_get_action_template for param schema, but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like action1_deploy_update, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mguttmann/action1-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server