calls_batch_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions 'update' implying mutation but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like required permissions, whether updates are partial or full, error handling for invalid inputs, or rate limits. This is a significant gap for a batch mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded and appropriately sized for its content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (batch update with nested objects), lack of annotations, and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It doesn't explain what happens on success/failure, return values, or constraints, leaving critical gaps for safe and effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter semantics beyond the input schema, which has 0% description coverage. However, the schema is detailed with nested properties and enums, providing structure. The description doesn't compensate for the coverage gap, but the schema's clarity gives a baseline understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update multiple call records') and scope ('in a single request'), which is specific and distinguishes it from singular update tools like 'calls_update'. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from other batch operations like 'calls_batch_create' or 'calls_batch_archive' beyond the verb 'update'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'calls_update' for single updates or 'calls_batch_create' for creating new records. The description only states what it does, not when it's appropriate or any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.