Удаление IP у балансировщика

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds behavioral context by clarifying that IPs are 'снимает их из распределения трафика' (removed from traffic distribution), which goes beyond a simple 'remove' and suggests a non-destructive, reversible action. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that clearly conveys purpose and behavior without unnecessary filler. It is well-structured and front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with only 2 required parameters and no output schema, the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose and effect. It could optionally mention expected response or error conditions, but those are not required given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for both parameters (ips and balancer_id) with 100% coverage. The description does not add any additional parameter-level meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Удаляет' (removes) and the resource 'backend IP-адреса у балансировщика' (backend IP addresses from the balancer), distinguishing it from sibling add_balancer_ips. The parenthetical 'снимает их из распределения трафика' further clarifies the exact purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (removing backend IPs from traffic distribution) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like add_balancer_ips or list_balancer_ips. No exclusions or alternative recommendations are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.