Удаление DNS-записи

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states 'deletes' which directly contradicts the destructiveHint=false annotation. This is a serious inconsistency that could mislead an agent about the tool's side effects. No additional behavioral context is provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no wasted words. The mention of 'API v2' is a minor extra but does not detract from conciseness. It is appropriately front-loaded with the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter delete tool, the description adequately states the purpose. However, the annotation contradiction undermines the overall completeness, and the description does not address failure scenarios or prerequisites, leaving gaps that could matter in edge cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides full descriptions for both parameters (100% coverage). The description adds no additional meaning to the parameters, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it deletes a DNS record by ID for a specified domain. The verb 'deletes' and resource 'DNS record' are specific, and the scope ('by ID for the specified domain') distinguishes it from domain or subdomain deletion tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The context for use is clear: this tool is for deleting a specific DNS record. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, but the narrow scope makes the usage obvious. It lacks explicit exclusions but is not misleading.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.