Создание ссылки на скачивание образа

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a write operation (readOnly=false) and non-idempotent behavior. The description adds valuable context: 'Процесс асинхронный' (asynchronous process) and the auth requirement for cloud types. This goes beyond the annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence that front-loads the primary purpose and packs in essential details about type behavior and async execution without any wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The core action and parameter semantics are well covered, but there is no output schema and the description does not mention what the response contains or how to track the async process (e.g., using get_image_download). This leaves a notable gap for a 7-parameter, conditionally auth-dependent tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description enriches the 'type' parameter by explaining what each enum value does (direct link vs cloud copy) and clarifies the conditional requirement for access_token. This adds meaning beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a download link for an image ('Создаёт ссылку на скачивание образа'). It further distinguishes between direct link (timeweb) and cloud copy (google_drive/yandex), setting it apart from create_image or get_image_download.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers usage context for the type parameter (direct link vs cloud copy) and notes the access_token requirement for cloud types. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool over sibling tools like get_image_download for status polling, so guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.