Получение настроек деплоя по умолчанию

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states the tool 'gets' a list, implying a read-only operation, but the annotations declare readOnlyHint=false, which contradicts this. No other behavioral traits are disclosed, making this a severe transparency failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that gets straight to the point. It contains no filler or redundant information, and the structure is appropriate for the simple operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple zero-parameter listing tool, the description provides the core purpose but lacks any detail about the return format (no output schema). Additionally, the contradiction between the described read behavior and readOnlyHint=false leaves a meaningful completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and an empty schema, so the rubric establishes a baseline score of 4. The description does not need to add parameter details because none exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Получает' (gets) and identifies a clear resource: 'список настроек деплоя по умолчанию для различных фреймворков' (list of default deployment settings for various frameworks). This clearly distinguishes it from all sibling tools, which focus on other resources like servers, databases, or networks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose is unique among siblings, as no other tool deals with deployment settings, so the intended use case is obvious. Although it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, the context makes it clear when to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.