Список сетевых драйверов Kubernetes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotation contradiction: the description implies a read-only operation ('Возвращает список'), but annotations set readOnlyHint=false. The description also does not disclose response format or authorization needs, but the contradiction alone drops this to 1.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the action and object, and enumerates all known driver values. It contains no filler or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-parameter list tool, the description provides the purpose and all expected values (kuberouter, calico, flannel, cilium). It does not describe the response shape, but it is sufficient to invoke correctly given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline for zero params is 4. The description adds no parameter details, but none are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Возвращает список' and names the resource 'сетевых драйверов для создания кластера', listing concrete values. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling list tools like list_k8s_versions and list_k8s_presets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the intended use context: 'для создания кластера' (for cluster creation). It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternatives, but the context is clear for a simple enumeration tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.