Получение пользователя кластера

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a read-only GET operation, but the annotations set readOnlyHint=false and idempotentHint=false, which contradicts the behavioral nature of the tool. This is a flagrant contradiction, as GET requests are inherently read-only and idempotent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that includes the endpoint URL. It is concise with no wasted words, earning a perfect score for structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the operation is simple, the description lacks important context: it does not explain what information is returned, does not mention authentication or prerequisite clusters, and the confusion with annotations reduces overall completeness. No output schema exists, so the description should have provided more detail on return values and behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage with descriptive names and mandatory flags for both parameters (admin_id and db_cluster_id). The description does not add additional parameter semantics, but the schema already communicates the essential meaning, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns information about a database cluster user, and the endpoint path shows that it is a GET request for a specific admin_id within a db_cluster_id. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_database_admins, update_database_admin, and delete_database_admin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for retrieving a single database cluster admin by ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus listing admins or other alternatives. No exclusions or when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.