Получение доступных пресетов для создания приложения

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description simply restates that it returns a list, adding no behavioral detail beyond annotations. More seriously, annotations mark readOnlyHint:false, while a 'get list' operation implies read-only semantics, creating an annotation contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The entire description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundant clauses. It is appropriately sized for a zero-parameter list operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

In isolation, the description names the resource and result, but it lacks any mention of return format, completeness caveats (openWorldHint is only in annotations), or relation to create_timeweb_app. Because it is a very simple no-param tool, the gaps are moderate; however, the contradictory annotation and absence of output schema reduce completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema is trivially fully covered. The description adds no parameter semantics, but none are needed; baseline 4 for zero-param tools applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Получает список' – gets a list) and identifies the exact resource ('доступных пресетов для создания приложения' – available presets for creating an application). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling preset-list tools such as get_bucket_presets or list_server_presets by adding the 'for application creation' scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives, nor does it mention exclusions or prerequisites. The only implied use case is retrieving presets before creating an application (sibling create_timeweb_app), but this is not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.