Удаление поддоменов S3-хранилища

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says the tool deletes subdomains, which directly contradicts the annotation destructiveHint=false. This is a significant annotation contradiction. No additional behavioral context is provided (e.g., irreversibility, partial failure behavior), and per the rubric this dimension must be scored 1.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences: the first states the action, the second states the return value. Every word earns its place, and it is front-loaded with the core operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool with well-documented schema parameters, the description is minimally viable: it states what is deleted and that per-subdomain status is returned. However, it lacks caveats about destructive effects, missing-subdomain behavior, or interactions with certificates, and the conflicting annotation undermines completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers both parameters with 100% description coverage, including an example for subdomains. The description adds only that deletion status is returned per subdomain, but this is not parameter-specific, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Удаляет один или несколько поддоменов из S3-хранилища' (Deletes one or more subdomains from S3 storage). This specifies a concrete verb and resource, and naturally distinguishes it from sibling tools like add_bucket_subdomains and list_bucket_subdomains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete_subdomain or add_bucket_subdomains. It also omits prerequisites or side effects, leaving the agent to infer usage solely from the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.