Добавление IP-адреса сервера

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a non-read-only, non-idempotent, non-destructive operation. The description adds the context of allocating a new address and optional PTR record, but doesn't disclose side effects like billing or constraints. It doesn't contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise, with two sentences that convey the core action and the optional PTR feature. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple parameter set and safety annotations, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and the optional PTR behavior. It lacks return-value details, but no output schema exists and the schema already explains parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters have descriptive schema entries (100% coverage), so the description adds little beyond the schema. The description mentions IPv4/IPv6 and PTR, which aligns with the 'type' and 'ptr' parameters, but doesn't add new semantic details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool allocates a new IPv4 or IPv6 address for a server, with optional PTR record. This specific verb+resource distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_server_ip and update_server_ip.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or alternative recommendations. It only states the action, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool's name and action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.