Удаление AI-агента

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states the operation is irreversible and destructive, but the annotation destructiveHint=false contradicts this. This is a direct contradiction between description and structured metadata, reducing trust and transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with a warning. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, contains no fluff, and effectively communicates the key caveat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the essential behavior and irreversibility. However, the annotation contradiction introduces confusion, and there is no mention of side effects or error conditions, making it only partially complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully defines the sole parameter agent_id with a clear description, providing 100% coverage. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Удаляет AI-агента по ID' (Deletes AI agent by ID). It uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_ai_agents, get_ai_agent, and update_ai_agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The warning '⚠️ Операция необратима — подтверждай с пользователем' gives clear usage context: confirm with the user before use. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites (e.g., existence of the agent).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.