Создание реестра контейнеров

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations showing readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, the description adds meaningful behavioral details by explaining the mutually exclusive modes and the naming constraints. This goes beyond the annotations, though it does not discuss side effects, permissions, or return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise paragraph of two sentences, front-loaded with the core action. It includes essential constraints without any fluff or redundant phrasing, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 parameters, 1 required, and a fully documented schema, the description covers the essential usage (creation, modes, naming). It does not mention response format or synchronous behavior, but the schema and annotations provide sufficient context for a create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% parameter description coverage, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description reiterates the key constraints (preset_id vs configurator_id + disk) that are already present in the schema, adding little new semantic value. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool creates a new container registry, using the specific verb 'Создаёт' and resource 'реестр контейнеров'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_container_registries or delete_container_registry, and the two configuration modes are also mentioned.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage context by indicating when to use the tool (to create a registry) and how to choose between the two configuration modes (preset_id or configurator_id + disk). However, it does not explicitly mention exclusions or alternative tools for related operations like updates or deletes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.