resolve_tool_schema

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. The verb 'Return' implies a safe, read-only operation, which is useful, but it does not describe any side effects, error conditions, or limitations. For a simple schema lookup, this is acceptable but not rich in detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently communicates the tool's purpose and parameter format without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one parameter, no output schema, and no nested objects, the description provides sufficient information to invoke it. The term 'deferred tools' is somewhat unclear, but the overall context and sibling tool names help. Minor additional context about what 'deferred' means could improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides no descriptions (0% coverage), but the description compensates by explaining the sole parameter's format: 'tools=comma-separated names.' This adds meaningful semantics beyond the schema's bare 'Tools' title, though it could elaborate on allowed values or separators.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Return') and the resource ('full parameter schemas for deferred tools'), making it distinct from sibling tools like discover_tools which likely list available tools. The purpose is immediately understandable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when parameter schemas for deferred tools are needed, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives or provide exclusions. No alternative tools are mentioned, so guidance is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.