update_admin_users_by_item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description offers no behavioral information beyond 'Update', which is already implied by the tool name. There are no annotations to fill the gap. Key aspects like side effects, permission requirements, or idempotency are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two words), but this comes at the expense of clarity. Conciseness should preserve usefulness; here, it is under-specified. The description does not earn its place as it adds no value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (23 parameters, many siblings, no schema descriptions, no annotations), the description is completely inadequate. It does not mention return values despite an output schema existing, nor does it provide any execution context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning no parameter descriptions exist in the schema. The description does not compensate by explaining any of the 23 parameters (10 required). The agent has no insight into what each parameter does or how to use them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Update One' is a tautology that restates the verb from the tool name without specifying the resource. It fails to indicate that this tool updates admin users by item, as the full name suggests. The description provides no meaningful purpose beyond the name itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidelines are given for when to use this tool versus other update tools in the sibling list. With many update tools for different resources (e.g., update_comments_by_item, update_groups_labels_by_item), the absence of any comparative guidance makes selection difficult.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.