list_recipes_by_slug_comments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not disclose pagination, ordering, rate limits, or any behavioral traits. Minimal information leaves agent guessing about response format and side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short and to the point, but lacks substance. Every word is used, but the brevity results in incomplete information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 2 params and output schema, but no annotation context. Description fails to provide critical details like return structure, pagination, or relation to other comment endpoints. Incomplete given sibling richness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%. Description adds minimal meaning (slug identifies recipe) but does not explain the accept-language parameter or its effect. No constraints or examples provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (get) and resource (comments for a recipe). It distinguishes from siblings like get_comments_by_item (single comment) and create/update/delete comments. Lacks specificity on scope ('all' vs paginated).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_comments_by_item or list_comments. Does not mention prerequisites (e.g., slug must exist) or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.