delete_admin_users_by_item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention that this is a destructive operation that deletes an admin user, any required permissions, or side effects. Merely saying 'Delete One' is insufficient for safe use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise but at the cost of essential information. Every sentence should be informative; this single two-word phrase lacks substance and is underspecified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete operation, the description should mention what is returned (e.g., confirmation, deleted object, or success status). It does not, leaving the agent without necessary information about the tool's output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning beyond the input schema. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description should compensate but does not explain the required 'item_id' parameter or the optional 'accept-language'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete One' is too vague. While the tool name indicates it's for deleting admin users, the description does not specify the resource (admin users) or the action scope, making it unclear without relying on the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other deletion tools like 'delete_admin_groups_by_item' or 'delete_admin_households_by_item'. The context from sibling tools is not addressed in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.