Get Admin Users By Item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the full behavioral burden, but 'Get One' discloses nothing beyond the generic verb. It does not address auth requirements, side effects, pagination, or error behavior, nor does it clarify what is returned beyond a single item.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two words is not conciseness but under-specification. The description is front-loaded but contains no useful information for tool invocation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the output schema and simple parameter set, the description is not complete enough for an agent to select or invoke the tool confidently. It omits the resource, the purpose, and any relationship to the surrounding by-item tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to either parameter. An agent gets no help understanding what item_id should contain beyond the bare uuid format, or what accept-language controls.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get One' states only that a single resource is fetched, but never names the resource (admin users) or the item key. It restates the 'get' part of the name without adding any detail, and it does nothing to distinguish this tool from the many other get_*_by_item siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. There is no mention of when to call this tool, what item_id should refer to, or any alternative tools to prefer, leaving the agent to infer everything from the name and schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.