list_auth_oauth
List available OAuth login providers for authentication.
Instructions
Oauth Login
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List available OAuth login providers for authentication.
Oauth Login
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and description does not disclose behavioral traits (e.g., authentication requirements, side effects, or whether it initiates a redirect). Zero transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely brief (2 words) but under-specified. Not effectively concise as it sacrifices clarity for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With zero parameters, no output schema, and a critical authentication tool, the description provides almost no context. Missing return type, relation to OAuth flow, or sibling tool coordination.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100% (trivially). Baseline 3 applies, but description adds no value explaining what the tool returns or expects.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description is 'Oauth Login', which is vague. The name indicates a list operation, but the description suggests a login action, causing confusion. No specific verb or resource scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_auth_oauth_callback or list_auth_refresh. Missing context on prerequisites or typical flow.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/djwmarcx/better-mealie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server