List Organizers Tools

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but 'Get All' reveals nothing about pagination behavior, default ordering, response structure, authorization needs, or whether all records are actually returned in one call. This is a significant transparency gap for a tool with nine optional parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. Two words cannot adequately document a list endpoint with nine optional parameters and no annotation coverage. Every useful field that could clarify behavior is absent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has nine parameters, no annotations, 0% schema description coverage, and a large set of sibling organizer tools, the description is far too thin to be useful. It does not distinguish this tool from list_organizers_categories or list_organizers_tags, nor does it explain the purpose of its parameters. An agent would have to guess nearly everything about correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate by explaining any of the nine parameters. Parameters like page, search, orderBy, queryFilter, and paginationSeed are left entirely without semantic meaning. The phrase 'Get All' gives no hint about how these parameters shape the request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get All' is essentially a tautology of the tool name 'list_organizers_tools' — it restates the listing operation without naming the resource or scope. It lacks a specific verb+resource phrase such as 'List organizer tools with pagination and filters,' so an agent gets no real clarity beyond what the name already implies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus siblings like list_organizers_categories or list_organizers_tags. There is no mention of pagination, filtering, or when the optional parameters should be applied. The description provides no context to help an agent choose this tool correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.