create_admin_backups_upload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the file upload nature but omits key behavioral traits such as file size limits, success/failure handling, whether the import happens immediately or asynchronously, and the response format. The schema indicates a binary file upload, but the description does not elaborate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence with no extraneous content. However, it is under-specified, which limits its value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 2 parameters (one required) and an output schema, but the description lacks details about the output, the purpose of 'accept-language', and any constraints (e.g., file size, format validation). For a file upload tool, this is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, requiring the description to compensate. It only hints at the 'archive' parameter by mentioning '.zip File' but does not explain its format, requirements, or the 'accept-language' parameter. The description adds minimal meaning beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Upload') and the resource ('.zip File') with a specific purpose ('to later be imported into Mealie'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_admin_backups' which likely creates a backup rather than uploading an archive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_admin_backups' or other backup-related tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or situations where this tool should be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.