delete_users_api_tokens_by_token

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description is solely responsible. It states 'Delete', implying destruction, but does not disclose consequences (e.g., immediate invalidation, irreversibility) or error handling (e.g., what happens if token_id does not exist). Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one sentence, 6 words). While no fluff, it is under-specified for practical use. Balance between brevity and informativeness is poor.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with an output schema, the description should mention expected result (e.g., deletion confirmation) or that it is irreversible. Given no annotations, the description feels incomplete. Adequacy is minimal.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the purpose of any parameters (token_id, accept-language). For a required parameter, this omission forces the agent to guess its meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Delete api_token from the Database', which specifies verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish from other delete tools (e.g., delete_users_by_item) beyond the name, which is left to the agent to infer. The purpose is clear but lacks explicit differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool (e.g., for revoking a user's API token) vs. other deletion tools. No indication of prerequisites or alternatives. The agent must rely on the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.