delete_shared_recipes_by_item
Delete a specific shared recipe by providing its unique ID. Removes the shared recipe permanently from the system.
Instructions
Delete One
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | ||
| accept-language | No |
Delete a specific shared recipe by providing its unique ID. Removes the shared recipe permanently from the system.
Delete One
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | ||
| accept-language | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permanence of deletion, side effects, or required permissions. The agent has no way to assess the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is too sparse to be considered concise. It is under-specified, failing to convey essential information beyond a minimal verb.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool is a delete operation with two parameters and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It lacks details about prerequisites, behavior, and effects, leaving the agent with too many unknowns.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no information about the parameters. The agent must infer the purpose of item_id (required) and accept-language (optional) from the tool name alone, which is insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete One' is extremely vague and does not specify what resource is being deleted. The tool name provides context (shared recipes), but the description itself lacks a specific verb+resource combination and does not distinguish from sibling delete tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_recipes_by_slug or delete_households_shopping_items_by_item. The description completely lacks usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/djwmarcx/better-mealie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server