List Admin Email

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The word 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but nothing is disclosed about auth requirements, response shape, or what happens with the optional accept-language parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It front-loads no useful resource scope or selection criteria, and the single sentence does not earn its place because it is too generic to guide an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists, the description still fails to provide enough context for an agent to select this tool among a large set of admin and information endpoints. It omits the admin email context implied by the name and gives no behavioral or usage information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description needed to compensate, but it adds nothing about the accept-language parameter. The parameter name is somewhat self-explanatory as an HTTP language preference, but no additional meaning or expected value format is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states an action (get) and a broad object (general application information), so it is not a pure tautology. However, it is vague and does not mention the admin email resource implied by the tool name and title. It also does not differentiate the tool from siblings like list_admin_about or list_app_about.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus any alternative. The description provides no context about admin scope, prerequisites, or relationship to the many sibling admin/info tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.