list_auth_oauth_callback
Lists registered OAuth callback URLs for Mealie authentication integration.
Instructions
Oauth Callback
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Lists registered OAuth callback URLs for Mealie authentication integration.
Oauth Callback
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full responsibility. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication requirements, or data scope.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (two words) but lacks substance. It is not concise in a beneficial way; it omits essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide a complete picture. It does not specify what the tool returns or under what circumstances it should be used.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Although there are 0 parameters and schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no value beyond the schema. It does not explain the purpose of the tool or the nature of its return, which is critical when no output schema exists.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Oauth Callback' is vague and essentially restates the tool name. It does not specify the action (list) or what is being listed, making it hard for an agent to understand the tool's function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_auth_oauth or list_auth_refresh. The description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/djwmarcx/better-mealie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server