create_organizers_toolsCreate a named meal organizer with language preference and linked households for streamlined meal planning and management.
Create One
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| accept-language | No | ||
| householdsWithTool | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v3.20.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of explaining side effects, permissions, or persistence behavior. 'Create One' discloses none of this, leaving the agent unable to anticipate the operation's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two words are economical, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The description is front-loaded but empty, providing no useful information to justify its brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Even though an output schema exists, the description fails to explain the resource type, creation semantics, or relationship to the extensive sibling tool set. This is far too incomplete for an agent to reliably select or invoke the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description mentions none of the three parameters. The agent receives no help understanding that 'name' is required, what 'accept-language' controls, or what 'householdsWithTool' expects.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create One' does not state what is being created; it lacks a resource noun and merely echoes the verb 'create' from the tool name. It cannot distinguish this tool from sibling creation tools like create_organizers_categories or create_organizers_tags.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no conditions or exclusions. The description gives the agent no decision criteria for invoking this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.