create_auth_logout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Logout', implying session termination, but does not disclose side effects (e.g., token invalidation, clearance of cookies). Behavioral traits are severely under-described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise but lacks substance. It is under-specified and does not front-load useful information. Being too short without key details reduces its effectiveness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of sibling tools and the parameter, the description is incomplete. It fails to mention that this tool likely requires an active session, ends the session, or invalidates tokens. The minimal text does not provide adequate context for invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the sole parameter 'accept-language'. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, failing to compensate for the parameter's undocumented semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a single word 'Logout', which is vague. It does not specify a verb-resource format or differentiate from sibling tools like 'create_auth_token' for login. The purpose is implied but not clearly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., being authenticated) or exclusions (e.g., use 'create_auth_token' for login). The description lacks context for proper selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.