boss_shortlist_add

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无注释支持，描述仅说明添加操作和附带功能，未披露副作用、权限、重复添加行为等细节。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述简短，但存在重复文本（可用性: 可用性:），影响整洁度。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

无输出schema，描述未说明操作结果或确认信息，对于添加操作上下文不完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

schema覆盖率100%，描述提及标签和备注但未增加额外语义（如格式限制），基线为3分。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确说明将职位加入本地候选池，并支持附加标签和备注，动词+资源清晰，与sibling工具（如boss_shortlist_remove）区分明显。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述未提供何时使用或替代方案，仅说明功能，缺乏使用场景指引。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.