boss_ai_reply

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes output (2-3 drafts) and support features but does not disclose side effects, auth requirements, or safety profile. With no annotations, description partially informs but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence effectively front-loads purpose and key features. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description hints at return type (drafts) and count. Sufficient for a generation tool but could mention output format explicitly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning beyond schema by explaining purpose of parameters: multi-draft generation, resume reference, and tone preference. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; extra context justifies 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'generate' and resource 'reply drafts' with specific details: 2-3 candidates, resume reference, and tone preference. Distinguishes from sibling AI tools by focusing on draft generation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when responding to recruiter messages but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. No mention of alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.