boss_preset_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states the action of deletion but does not clarify whether deletion is permanent, if confirmation is required, or what happens if the preset does not exist. For a destructive action, more behavioral context is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief but contains a duplication ('[可用性: 可用性: ...]') and mixes an availability note with the core purpose. This reduces clarity and structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema), the description covers the basic action and parameter. However, it lacks details about behavior (e.g., permanence, error handling) that would make it complete, especially in the absence of annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any meaning beyond what the schema already provides for the 'name' parameter. It simply repeats the parameter's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb '删除' (delete) and the resource '搜索预设' (search preset), with '指定' indicating it deletes a specific preset by name. This effectively distinguishes the tool from its siblings (boss_preset_add and boss_preset_list).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides an availability note about role and platform restrictions but offers no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like boss_preset_add or boss_preset_list. The usage context is implied (when deletion is needed) but not explicitly differentiated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.