boss_preset_list
List all available search presets for job searches, enabling quick access to predefined filters and criteria.
Instructions
列出所有搜索预设
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all available search presets for job searches, enabling quick access to predefined filters and criteria.
列出所有搜索预设
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states listing all presets, but does not mention potential limitations like pagination or scope (user vs. system). The straightforward nature prevents a lower score.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Essential information is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Description is sufficient for a parameterless list tool, but could clarify whether the list is user-specific or system-wide. No output schema exists, but the return format is implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no parameters; schema coverage is 100%. According to guidelines, baseline is 4. No additional parameter info needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb '列出' (list) and the resource '搜索预设' (search presets), which is distinct from siblings like 'boss_preset_add' and 'boss_preset_remove'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as searching or filtering. No context about prerequisites or intended use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/can4hou6joeng4/boss-agent-cli'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server