hubspot_list_workflows
Retrieve a list of all HubSpot automation workflows to review and manage your automated processes.
Instructions
List all automation workflows in HubSpot.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all HubSpot automation workflows to review and manage your automated processes.
List all automation workflows in HubSpot.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'list all' without any details on behavioral traits like pagination, rate limits, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the purpose. It is efficient but lacks additional structure or details that could be helpful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is minimal and does not mention pagination, filtering, or response fields, which are important for a list tool. Given no output schema or annotations, the description does not provide sufficient completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters and 100% schema description coverage (trivially), the description doesn't need to compensate for parameter info. However, it could clarify what properties are returned, but overall is adequate for a no-param tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List all automation workflows in HubSpot' uses a specific verb (List) and clearly identifies the resource (automation workflows). It distinguishes from siblings like 'hubspot_get_workflow' which retrieves a single workflow.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it could mention that this lists all workflows while hubspot_get_workflow is for a specific one.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/adeel0x01/hubspot-mcp-tools'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server