Skip to main content
Glama
adeel0x01

HubSpot MCP Server

by adeel0x01

hubspot_get_owner

Fetch detailed information about a HubSpot owner by their owner ID. Optionally include archived owners or specify the ID property for lookup.

Instructions

Get detailed information about a specific HubSpot owner by their ID.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ownerIdYesThe owner ID (numeric)
archivedNoInclude if owner is archived
idPropertyNoThe property to use for lookup (id or userId)id
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'detailed information' but does not specify what fields are returned or any edge cases (e.g., invalid ownerId). It adequately indicates a read operation but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose. Slight improvement could be made by front-loading the required ownerId parameter, but it remains effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and full schema coverage, the description is adequate but not comprehensive. It lacks details on return values or how it interacts with siblings, which could help an agent make better decisions. With no output schema, some return field description would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter clearly described in the input schema. The description does not add any extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get detailed information about a specific HubSpot owner by their ID' clearly states the action (get) and resource (owner), and specifies identification by ID. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool hubspot_list_owners, which lists all owners; this could be improved.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like hubspot_list_owners. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as needing the ownerId beforehand, or when to use idProperty vs ownerId.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/adeel0x01/hubspot-mcp-tools'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server