seerr_update_discover_sliders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false; the description adds 'WRITE: this modifies your Seerr instance,' but this largely restates the annotation. It does not disclose specifics like whether this overwrites existing slider settings, requires elevated permissions, or has side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (two short sentences) and front-loaded. However, the second sentence ('WRITE: this modifies...') adds little beyond the annotation, so there is minor waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a batch write operation with an undocumented body parameter, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain the required payload, potential side effects, or any prerequisites. The presence of an output schema does not compensate for the missing parameter semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'body' is completely undocumented in the schema (0% coverage) and the description provides no guidance on its expected structure or content. The agent cannot infer what should be passed to the API.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Batch update') and the target ('all sliders'), distinguishing it from the singular sibling tool seerr_update_discover_slider. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for batch operations ('Batch update all sliders') but does not explicitly state when to prefer this over seerr_update_discover_slider or other slider tools, nor does it mention exclusions or prerequisites. The guidance is implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.