seerr_create_settings_notifications_webpush

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds a direct warning that it modifies the Seerr instance. This confirms the write nature but does not detail what settings are affected, whether they are overwritten, or if admin permissions are required. It adds some context beyond the annotations, but still lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with an extra 'WRITE' emphasis; it communicates the core purpose efficiently with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested body object, output schema) and lack of parameter documentation, this minimal description is insufficient. It omits what fields are valid, how the update behaves (merge vs replace), and what a successful response looks like. The agent would likely be unable to use this tool correctly without external documentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single free-form 'body' object with no property descriptions, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description only says 'Web Push notification settings' without specifying expected fields or structure, leaving the agent without meaningful guidance for constructing the request body.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update Web Push notification settings' with a clear verb and resource, distinguishing it from the list and test webpush sibling tools. While the tool name uses 'create' instead of 'update,' the description itself is unambiguous and action-oriented.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool is used to modify webpush notification settings, but it does not explicitly state when to use this over other notification tools or list/test variants. There is no mention of alternatives or conditions, so guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.