seerr_register_push_subscription

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'WRITE: this modifies your Seerr instance', which reinforces the readOnlyHint=false annotation. It provides a small amount of context beyond annotations (that the modification is to the instance), but does not elaborate on side effects, required permissions, or response behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence but is somewhat cluttered, combining the verb, path, and a WRITE label in an awkward structure. It is concise but not well-organized, and could be improved by separating the action from the behavioral note.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the open 'body' parameter, the lack of parameter documentation, and no usage guidance, the description is incomplete. The output schema exists but does not compensate for the missing input semantics, so the agent cannot reliably construct a correct request.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one 'body' parameter with no description and additionalProperties allowed, and the schema coverage is 0%. The description does not explain what the body should contain, what fields are expected for a web push subscription, or any example structure, leaving the parameter completely ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Register' with the resource 'web push', and the path '/user/registerPushSubscription' reinforces the action. It clearly indicates this is for creating a push subscription, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like list/get/delete push subscriptions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention preconditions, whether it applies to the current user, or when one would choose register over other push subscription operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.