seerr_create_settings_notifications_email

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly notes 'WRITE' and 'this modifies your Seerr instance', which aligns with the annotations (readOnlyHint=false). It adds context that the operation is a write, but does not elaborate on side effects, reversibility, or specific settings impacted, which the annotations already partially cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and is concise, but the insertion of 'WRITE:' is a bit awkward. It front-loads the main action and is not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description states the basic action but lacks details about the request body, expected response, or prerequisites. Given the generic schema and the complexity of notification settings, this is insufficient for correct invocation, especially since the output schema is not described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines a single 'body' object with no properties specified and additionalProperties allowed. The description does not clarify what fields are expected in the body, leaving the agent without guidance on what to include, and schema description coverage is 0%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool updates email notification settings and explicitly labels it as a write operation. It distinguishes from the list tool by using 'Update', but the tool name says 'create' while the description says 'update', which could cause slight confusion, and it does not mention the test counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like the list or test variants. It only states the function, leaving the agent to infer the use case from the sibling tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.