seerr_get_user_watchlist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=true already indicates this is a safe read operation, and the description does not contradict it. The description adds no extra behavioral context such as pagination behavior, authentication requirements, or error conditions, but given the annotation coverage, a mid-range score is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence: 'Get the Plex watchlist for a specific user'. It is front-loaded and contains no wasted words, earning a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the existence of an output schema, the description is mostly complete. However, it lacks any mention of pagination via the page parameter or differentiation from similar watchlist tools. It is adequate for a basic getter but leaves some gaps in usage guidance and parameter meaning.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has two parameters (user_id and page) with 0% description coverage. The description only mentions 'specific user' which implies user_id, but does not explain the page parameter or any constraints (e.g., user_id must be an existing user). The description does not compensate for the schema's lack of semantic detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get), the resource (Plex watchlist), and the scope (for a specific user). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like seerr_list_discover_watchlist, which likely returns a general watchlist, and seerr_get_user_watch_data, which may return watch statistics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for retrieving a specific user's Plex watchlist, providing clear context. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives or exclude other watchlist-related tools, and there is no when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.